Fair Labor Standards Act: A Trap for the Unwary

Since the Fair Labor Standards Act became law over 50 years ago, employers have struggled with the application of the so-called white collar exemption.

The FLSA provides exemptions from the minimum wage and overtime requirements for employees who work in an executive, administrative, or professional capacity. To qualify for those white collar exemptions, an employee must satisfy two criteria.

The first focuses on the nature of the employee's "primary duty" and whether the job in question involves the exercise of discretion and judgment.

The second criterion concerns the form of the employee's compensation, in that the employee must be paid "on a salary basis" in order to qualify for exemption. DOL's regulations provide that an employee is compensated "on a salary basis" if he regularly receives, on a weekly or less frequent basis, a predetermined amount of pay that constitutes all or part of his compensation and that is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of work done. Accordingly, the employee must receive his full salary for any week during which he performed services and remained willing and able to do so throughout the week, even if the employer did not have sufficient work to keep him fully occupied.

Unwittingly, employers frequently violate the salary basis requirement by reducing an employee's pay for certain periods of absence. Such reductions can automatically disqualify the employee for exemption regardless of the nature of the duties being performed.

For example, an employee loses his salaried status if pay deductions are made for partial day absences, even where he was away from work for purely personal reasons. The same result occurs when the employer maintains a policy that provides for a pay reduction if a salaried employee has such an absence, despite the fact that the employer has never actually made a deduction in that circumstance. An employer may, however, require the employee to use accrued paid leave or compensatory time for full or partial day absences without jeopardizing his exemption.

DOL regulations also anticipate some situations that might occasionally pose a trap for the unwary employer. For instance, an employer may not make a deduction if the employee is absent for only part of a week for jury duty, attendance as a witness, or temporary military leave. The employer may, however, offset any amounts received as jury or witness fees or military pay for a particular week against the employee's weekly salary. DOL's regulations further provide that an employee loses his exemption if he is suspended without pay for less than a week, unless the discipline is imposed for violating a work rule of major significance relating to safety.

In some circumstances, the FLSA permits deductions from an exempt employee's compensation which will not affect his salaried status. Accordingly, an employer may make a deduction when the employee is absent for a day or more for personal reasons, other than sickness or accident, and for absences of at least a day that are occasioned by sickness or disability if the employer maintains a policy or plan that compensates the employee for salary lost on account of those types of absences.

Such a policy or plan may, moreover, establish a reasonable cap on the number of paid days of absence that an employee can obtain during the year. In addition, the employer does not have to pay a salaried employee for a week during which an absence results in the employee performing no services. An employer may also reduce a salaried employee's pay if an absence of any duration occurs as part of leave taken pursuant to the Family And Medical Leave Act. As you can see, the application of the salary basis criterion is much more complicated than might appear at first glance. Moreover, an unintentional misapplication of that criterion can trigger liability for many thousands of dollars of overtime compensation. Hence, employers should continuously monitor how the pay of their white collar employees is being treated.

 

 

Home | Our Firm | Attorneys | Expertise | E-Updates | E-Lerts | Publications | Alliances | Links | Contact

20 S. Charles Street | 11th Floor | Baltimore, MD 21201 | (410) 752-1040 | FAX (410) 752-8861
For any questions or comments, please e-mail us at shawe@shawe.com
Copyright © 2000-2007 Shawe Rosenthal, LLP, Disclaimer & legal notices.